<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SA Development (Regulated Trees) Amendment Bill &#8220;worse than current Act&#8221;, would push more costs on to local government, says Dems MLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gmarkets.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/sa-development-regulated-trees-amendment-bill-worse-than-current-act-would-push-more-costs-on-to-local-government-says-dems-mlc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gmarkets.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/sa-development-regulated-trees-amendment-bill-worse-than-current-act-would-push-more-costs-on-to-local-government-says-dems-mlc/</link>
	<description>EWN Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:41:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	</channel>
</rss>
